Staff Evaluation page format test

This is the page where users can evaluate bureaucrats of the wiki. You're free to leave your own evaluations, but please refer to the rules page first.

Adminguy
Critique by ThatOneCritic
 * Activity: I'd say that he's pretty much the least active out of all the non-retired bureaucrats. He only comes on to do small comments on blogs and say his opinion on certain plants and zombies. He never participates in important votes or discussions and never uses his rights. 3/30.
 * Behavior: Personality-wise on the outside he's a really nice guy and seems to respect others, but at times he can get out of hand in arguments. But when it comes to wiki-based matters, he flat out admitted that he stopped caring about it overall. He can probably be a good guy, sure, but he doesn't have an bureaucrat personality at all, ironically with his username being Adminguy. 2/20.
 * Total Score: 5/50. Seriously, just kick him out of the staff team. He doesn't even fit his username and there is no signs of improvement.
 * Adminguy's comment: OOOOOH I AM SO TRIGGERED ALL YOU DID HERE IS LIE I WEEL BAN YOU FOR LIFE (Author's note: this is just a joke comment I put because I didn't have much else to put, real staff members aren't actually allowed to do this.)

Overall Statistics

 * Average Score for Adminguy: 5/50, needs to get an average of 25/50 to be safe from the deliberation vote.
 * General consensus: A terrible bureaucrat. Needs to improve badly to secure his position.